Newton’s Law of Inertia vs. Galileo’s Assertion on Horizontal Motion
1. Newton’s Law of Inertia vs. Galileo’s Assertion on Horizontal Motion
Before Galileo and NEwton, many people thought objects slowed down because they had a natural built in tendency to do so. But those people weren't taking onto account the many forces - eg friction, gravity and air resistance- here on Earth that cause objects to change their velocity. If we could observe the motion of an object in deep interstellar space, we would be able to observe the natural tendencies of an object's motion free from any external influences. In deep interstellar space, we would observe that if an object had a velocity, it would continue moving with that velocity until there was some force to cause change in the motion. Similarly, if an object were at rest in interstellar space, it would remain at rest until there was a force to cause it to change its motion.
2. Explain why Galileo asserted that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion?
ye-
Explanation:
Before Galileo it had been thought that all horizontal motion required a direct cause, but Galileo deduced from his experiments that a body in motion would remain in motion unless a force (such as friction) caused it to come to rest.
3. The subtle distinction between newtons 1st law of motion and galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion
Newton's First Law of Motion(Law of Inertia)
4. Using galileo marble experiment, describe the motion of the marble if the opposite inclined plane is oriented horizontally
Answer:
Galileo argued that when the marble is released from left, it would roll down the slope and go up on the opposite side to the same height from which it was released. If the inclinations of the planes on both sides are equal then the marble will climb the same distance that it covered while rolling down.
5. Exercise 1: What's the Point? Using a Venn diagram, compare andcontrast the ideas of Newton and Galileo regarding motion. Inparticular, Newton's First Law of Motion and Galileo's assertion thatforce is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion.GalileoNewton
Explanation:
Newton's First Law of Motion and Galileo's assertion that
force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion.
Galileo
Newton
6. Directions: Based on your understanding about Galilean and Aristotelian concept of principles governing motion, COMPARE and CONTRAST their assertions regarding vertical motion, horizontal motion, and projectile motion by completing the table below. Aristotle Similarities Galileo Concept VERTICAL MOTION HORIZONTAL MOTION PROJECTILE MOTION
Answer:
1. No motion without a mover in contact with moving body.
2. Distinction between: (a) Natural motion: mover is internal to moving body (b) Forced motion: mover is external to moving body
Aristotle believed that the initial motive force transfers to the medium initially surrounding the object a "power" to act as a motive force. and the Medium then forces the object into a new region, which is then imparted with the "power" to act.
Aristotle's concept of different types of motion was destroyed when he described the projectile motion as a combination of horizontal and vertical motion and in the same terms and with the same relationships.
An Aristotelian proposal that heavier objects fall at the same rate was proved false by the only plausible Galilean explanation that all objects fall at the same rate. Galileo correctly measured motion in two independent directions (horizontal and vertical) and deduced that the “rate of fall” is better measured in terms of downward acceleration.
According to Galileo, a projectile which is carried by a uniform horizontal motion compounded with a naturally accelerated vertical motion describes a path which is a semi-parabola.
7. What is the subtle distinction between Newton's 1st law of motion and Galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion?
What is the subtle distinction between Newton's 1st law of motion and Galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion?
Galileo asserted that if friction were not present, the ball would continue to roll at constant velocity. It will continue its state of motion until a push or pull causes it to change that state. Galileo named this tendency of materials to resist change as inertia in their state of motion . His statement was the basis for Newton's first law of motion. They both indicated that no force is required to keep the object moving, and the inertia of the object would keep it from changing its state of motion.
Is there a difference between Galileo’s assertion and Newton’s first law of motion?
The difference is subtle. The distinction is the principle of force. Galileo knew about friction, but he didn't know about the concept of force. He used the word 'push and pull' to show power. It was Sir Isaac Newton who established the idea of force and its relationship with motion.
For more information visit this link:
https://brainly.ph/question/2153546
https://brainly.ph/question/1386542
#BetterWithBrainly
8. Directions: Based on your understanding about Galilean and Aristotelian concept of principles governing motion, COMPARE and CONTRAST their assertions regarding vertical motion, horizontal motion, and projectile motion by completing the table below. Aristotle Similarities Galileo Concept VERTICAL MOTION HORIZONTAL MOTION PROJECTILE MOTION
Answer:
The Difference between Aristotle's concept of motion and Galileo's notion of motion is eleven o'clock That aristotle Affirmed That force is removed from an object it will stop while Galileo said an objects motion is stopped Because of the force of friction.
9. How did Galileo describe the effect of force to objects in horizontal motion?
Answer:
Galileo was the first to make a Big Deal out of all motion being relative. This got him in Big Trouble with the Established Aristotelian ‘Philosophers’ of his day. (He was convicted of heresy and put under House Arrest for the remainder of his life.)
His newly designed telescopes showed him the moons around Jupiter, Saturn’s rings and that the Sun had SPOTS on it! (The Sun was supposed to be an unblemished paragon of astronomical beauty.) This led him to think that perhaps the Earth was not the center of everything. Perhaps the Earth was ‘just’ one planet that was moving around the Sun. He had this idea of ‘gravity’ that held things in orbit - but it had to be Newton that really put Gravity in it’s place with his Law of Universal Gravity.
“and yet, it MOVES” is the famous quote ascribed to him. We don’t feel the Earth move because we are moving along with it.
kung nahahābāan ka, ī-shōrt cūt mo nalang.
Galileo's laws of Motion: ... determined that the natural state of an object is rest or uniform motion, i.e. objects always have a velocity, sometimes that velocity has a magnitude of zero = rest. objects resist change in motion, which is called inertia.
10. Show how the Aristotle concepts of vertical motion, horizontal motion and Projectile motion is similar and different from Galileo through a venn diagram.
Answer:
Concepts of vertical motionals of Galileo's horizintal projectile our some similar
Explanation:
Answer:
Galileo
Vertical motion - If two objects of different weight are dropped from a height both of them will hit the ground at the same time.
Horizontal motion - If there is no interference, a moving object will keep moving in a straight line forever. There is no need to push, pull or apply force of any kind. For example, a ball rolling on a horizontal plane would neither speed up nor slow down. It would finally come to rest because of friction. He developed the idea of inertial which is the property of an object to resist changes in motion.
Projectile motion - Projectiles follow a curved path. According to Galileo projectile motion could be understood by analyzing the horizontal and vertical components separately.
aristotle
i. He believed that all objects have resting places which they naturally seek.
ii. On Earth all motion is linear. In the outer space all motion is curved.
iii. The speed of a falling object is directly related to its mass.
iv. An object continues to be in motion as long as force is applied to it. The object stops when the force is removed.
Vertical motion - The element Earth moves down towards its natural resting place. Air rises to its natural place in the atmosphere. Fire leaps upwards to it natural place above the atmosphere. Water's natural place is just above the Earth.
Horizontal motion - Bodies need to be pushed or pulled to maintain horizontal motion.
Projectile motion - An object is influenced by the downward force of gravity.
Explanation:
hope this help
11. What is the subtle distinction between Newton's 1st law of motion and Galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion?give some graphic organizer
Answer: What is the subtle distinction between Newton's 1st law of motion and Galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion? It will continue its state of motion until a push or pull causes it to change that state.
Answered by: Matthew Quemer Buyco
12. Activity 1 Great Motion Debate Directions: Based on your understanding about Galilean and Aristotelian concept of principles governing motion, COMPARE and CONTRAST their assertions regarding vertical motion, horizontal motion, and projectile motion by completing the table below. Concept VERTICAL MOTION HORIZONTAL MOTION PROJECTILE MOTION Aristotle Similarities Galileo
Answer:
Concept VERTICAL MOTION HORIZONTAL MOTION PROJECTILE MOTION
Aristotle -Believed that heavy objects fall faster than light objects. -Believed that vertical motion and horizontal motion were separate, and that objects would only move horizontally if a force was applied. -Believed that a projectile's motion is determined by its natural place in the universe, either falling straight down or continuing in a straight line at a uniform speed. -Objects moving horizontally through the air experience a resistance force that slows them down. -Objects thrown vertically will eventually lose their upward velocity and then fall straight down.
Galileo -Disproved Aristotle's assertion that heavier objects fall faster by showing that all objects, regardless of their weight, fall at the same rate in a vacuum. -Proposed that horizontal motion and vertical motion were not separate, and that objects in motion would continue moving at a constant speed unless acted on by an external force. -Demonstrated that a projectile's motion is a combination of horizontal and vertical motion, and that objects will move along a curved path. -Objects moving horizontally through the air will continue moving horizontally at a constant speed until acted on by an external force. -Objects thrown vertically will reach a maximum height and then fall straight down, with their vertical velocity decreasing until they hit the ground.
Similarities:
- Both Aristotle and Galileo recognized the existence of vertical motion.
- Both Aristotle and Galileo recognized the existence of horizontal motion.
- Both Aristotle and Galileo recognized the existence of projectile motion, although they had different explanations for it.
13. explain the subtle distinction between Newton law of motion and Galileos assertion
Answer:
Galileo asserted that if a rolling ball was 'left alone' it will continue to move with constant velocity. The only difference between Galileo's assertion and Newton's first law of motion is the concept of force. Galileo did not know yet the concept of force, and it was Newton who finally explains the nature of forces
14. Based on Galileo’s concept of motion, why is force not necessary for a body undergoing horizontal motion along a frictionless surface?
Question
Based on Galileo’s concept of motion, why is force not necessary for a body undergoing horizontal motion along a frictionless surface?
force is not necessary for a body undergoing horizontal motion along a frictionless surface because when the net force is zero and acceleration is zero because if the object has some constant velocity it continues with the same velocity until it has some external acceleration.
Here upon a horizontal motion the drag or friction is less to an extent , so it won't stop unless an until u apply an external force .
#StaySafeWithBrainly
#AnswerForTrees
15. What is the major difference between Newton's First Law of Motion and Galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion?
Answer:
The only difference between Galileo's assertion and Newton's first law of motion is the concept of force. Galileo did not know yet the concept of force, and it was Newton who finally explains the nature of forces.
Explanation:
16. what is the similarities of aristotle and galileo's horizontal motion
Aristotle and Galileo, Both have the concept of horizontal motion, in both cases the motion of objects falls naturally and is qualitatively different from vertical motion but vertical motion does not affect horizontal motion.
About Horizontal motion Aristotle's laws of motionIn Physics he stated that objects fall at a speed that is proportional to their weight and inversely proportional to the density of the liquid they are immersed in. This is a correct approximation for objects in the Earth's gravitational field moving through air or water.
Vertical motion The earth element moves downward towards its natural resting place. Horizontal motion- Qualitatively different. The body seems to need a push or a pull to maintain horizontal motion (as opposed to their 'natural' motion). Galileo's laws of motionUnderstand that the projectile path is a combination of horizontal and vertical movement. Galileo understood that vertical motion does not affect horizontal motion. An object projected horizontally will reach the ground in the same time as an object that is dropped vertically. The trajectory of any projectile is a parabola.
Learn more about horizontal motion at https://brainly.ph/question/15324507.
#SPJ2
17. Exercise 1: What's the Point? Using a Venn diagram, compare andcontrast the ideas of Newton and Galileo regarding motion. Inparticular, Newton's First Law of Motion and Galileo's assertion thatforce is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion.GalileoNewton
Explanation:
What's the Point of Using a Venn diagram, compare and
contrast the ideas of Newton and Galileo regarding motion.
18. how this trick is done without pulling the dishes and glasses with the cloth applying galileo's horizontal motion and newton's first law of motion?
Answer:
Newton's first law of Inertia explains how magician is able to tablecloth from under dishes and glassed on the table without disturbing them.
Explanation:
Yan po ata sorry kung mali...
Answer:
The simple answer to your question is inertia. In other words, when you pull the table cloth off the table full of dishes the dishes stay put because of inertia. Inertia is the property of matter that describes its resistance to any change in its motion.
19. Explain the suble distinction between newtons first law of motion and galileos assertions regarding force and motion by completing the table below
Answer:
Inertia refers to the tendency of any material to change its state of motion. Galileo asserted that if a rolling ball was 'left alone' it will continue to move with constant velocity. The only difference between Galileo's assertion and Newton's first law of motion is the concept of force.
20. Activity 1 Great Motion Debate Directions: Based on your understanding about Galilean and Aristotelian concept of principles governing motion, COMPARE and CONTRAST their assertions regarding vertical motion, horizontal motion, and projectile motion by completing the table below. Similarities Galileo Aristotle Concept VERTICAL MOTION HORIZONTAL MOTION PROJECTILE MOTION
In summary, Galileo's principles of motion were based on observations and experiments, whereas Aristotle's principles of motion were based on philosophical reasoning. Galileo's ideas challenged and contradicted the traditional Aristotelian view of motion, which had been widely accepted for centuries. Galileo's work laid the foundation for modern physics and helped pave the way for Isaac Newton's laws of motion.
21. Directions: Based on your understanding about Galilean and Aristotelian concept of principles governing motion, COMPARE and CONTRAST their assertions regarding vertical motion, horizontal motion, and projectile motion by completing the table bdow. Concept VERTICAL MOTION HORIZONTAL MOTION PROJECTILE MOTION Aristotle Similarities Galileo
Answer:
Concept | VERTICAL MOTION | HORIZONTAL MOTION | PROJECTILE MOTION
-----------|-----------------------|---------------------------|------------------------
Aristotle | Objects fall at speeds proportional to their weight.
| Objects in motion tend to come to rest unless acted upon by an external force.
| Objects follow curved paths due to a combination of horizontal and vertical motion.
Galileo
| Objects fall at the same rate regardless of their weight.
| Objects in motion continue in motion with a constant speed and direction unless acted upon by an external force.
| Objects follow a parabolic trajectory due to the combined effects of horizontal and vertical motion.
Similarities:
- Both Aristotle and Galileo acknowledge the existence of vertical motion.
- They both recognize the influence of external forces on horizontal motion.
- Both concepts involve the observation of motion in the physical world.
Contrasts:
- Aristotle believed that objects fall at speeds proportional to their weight, while Galileo proposed that objects fall at the same rate regardless of their weight.
- Aristotle's view on horizontal motion suggests that objects tend to come to rest unless acted upon by an external force, while Galileo's view states that objects in motion continue in motion with a constant speed and direction.
- In projectile motion, Aristotle viewed it as a combination of horizontal and vertical motion without considering the effects of air resistance, whereas Galileo described projectile motion as following a parabolic trajectory due to the combined effects of horizontal and vertical motion, taking into account the effects of air resistance.
Please note that this is a simplified representation of the concepts and their differences, and there may be additional nuances and details in their respective theories.
22. 2. Explain howGalileo Ihrerred UI UDJELI I Tuunecessary to sustain horizontal motion. (S11/12PS-IIVC-47)CONSTYT3. Explain the subtle distinction between Newton's ist Law of Motion (or Law of Inertia) and Galileo's assertthat force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion. (S11/12PS-IIVd-51)ActivitiesVenn diagram.
Answer:
a the answer walang and to the best for 2nd 8th to the food and family members to the best of luck with that in a love s when the best for 2nd to the food was 2nd and to be the first time in the best of luck with
23. Explain the subtle distinction between Newton's first law of motion and galileo's assertion regarding force and motion?
Answer:
Before Galileo it had been thought that all horizontal motion required a direct cause, but Galileo deduced from his experiments that a body in motion would remain in motion unless a force (such as friction) caused it to come to rest. This law is also the first of Isaac Newton's three laws of motion.
Explanation:
pa brainliest po ☺️
24. compare Aristotle and Galileo views of horizontal motion
Answer:
Aristotle's Theory of Motion had 2 basic
principles:-
1. No motion without a mover in contact
with moving body.
2. Distinction betwee :(a) Natural motion:
mover is internal to moving body (b) Force motion: mover is external to moving body
Aristotle believed that the initial motive force transfers to the medium initially surrounding the object a "power" to act as a motive force.And the medium then
forces the object into a new region , which is then imparted with the "power" to act.
Aristotle's concept of different types of motion
was destroyed when
he described the projectile motion as a combination
of horizonal and vertical motion and in the same terms and with the same relationship.
25. Is there a difference between Galileo's assertion and Newton's first law of motion
Answer:
The only difference between Galileo's assertion and Newton's first law of motion is the concept of force.
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
26. what is the major difference between newton's first law of motion and galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion?
keep safe always
make own answers
27. Draw an example on what have you learned between Newton's 1st Law of Motion (or Law of Inertia) and Galileo's assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion and describe your drawing.
Explanation:
nasa picture napo yung sagot sana po makatulong..pa brainliest nadin po please
28. How will you explain the distinction of the Law of Inertia and Galileo’s assertion that force is not necessary to sustain horizontal motion?
Explanation:
They both implied that no force is needed to keep the motion of an object and the object's inertia would keep it from changing its state of motion. ... The difference lies in the concept of force. Galileo knew about friction but did not know about the concept of force. He used the term 'push and pull' to signify forces.
29. Act. 2 Science ConsesusExplain the subtle distinction between Newton's first law of motion and Galileo's assertions regarding force and motion by completing the table below:Isaac Newton Concept. Galileo Galilei Inertia Force Body at rest body in motion
Answer:
Newton is the SI unit of force. It is equal to the force that would give a mass of one kilogram an acceleration of one meter per second per second, and is equivalent to 69,420 dynes.
— Mahal ni Matt si Joana
30. what is the similarity between galileo's assertion and newton's first law of motion?
Answer:
Inertia refers to the tendency of any material to change its state of motion. Galileo asserted that if a rolling ball was 'left alone' it will continue to move with constant velocity. The only difference between Galileo's assertion and Newton's first law of motion is the concept of force.
Explanation:
This is based on my research, I hope it helps tho.
